CAPTCHA Code * Recent Posts. Leave A Reply. Even the Polish PZL P.48 had a great power-to-weight ratio. The Spitfire also could not sustain a steep climb as well as the Zero. 5 comments. In comparative tests at 17 000 feet, the Spitfire was again unable to safely draw away from the Zero. 81% Upvoted. However, in this respect the Zero was even worse than the Spitfire, which permitted a glimmer of encouragement for the Spitfire pilot: the Zero could not get into a firing position behind the Spitfire if the latter evaded in diving aileron turns at high speed. No. They found that the Zero had a lower rated altitude than the Spitfire, 16 000 feet against 21 000 feet, which delivered the Spitfire a good speed advantage at height – it was 20 knots faster at 26 000 feet. At 6G (a hard turn or pull out at high speed, with the pilot blacking out), the Spitfire stalled at 184 knots IAS, which equated to 257 knots TAS at 20 000 feet, and 294 knots at 30 000. The film named ‘Eternal Zero’ is about a fictional Japanese pilot, Kyuzo Miyabe, and his career flying through the skies during World War 2. P-47 vs F4U Prev Next . Both suffer from heavy ailerons at high speed limiting roll rate. When RAAF Spitfire pilots like Keith ‘Bluey’ Truscott were posted back to Australia for assignment to the RAAF’s newly-formed Kittyhawk squadrons, they similarly dismissed the heavy American fighter. The Mitsubishi A6M "Zero" was a long-range fighter aircraft formerly manufactured by Mitsubishi Aircraft Company, a part of Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, and operated by the Imperial Japanese Navy from 1940 to 1945. This thread is archived. P-38 vs Zero f4u-corsair. Bf-109 vs Zero fw-190-wurger. However, it is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically. Flight Lieutenant ‘Bardie’ Wawn DFC and Squadron Leader Les Jackson DFC flew against one another in both aircraft, and what they found was not encouraging. Being able to fly more slowly while still under complete control meant the Zero could fly tighter turns without stalling out. Nonetheless, it was a Model 32 Zero that was captured and rebuilt, permitting the trials to occur in August 1943. F8F vs Zero f4u-corsair. Zero, also called Mitsubishi A6M or Navy Type 0, fighter aircraft, a single-seat, low-wing monoplane used with great effect by the Japanese during World War II.Designed by Horikoshi Jiro, it was the first carrier-based fighter capable of besting its land-based opponents. Spitfire Mk. P-47 vs Zero Prev Next . Japan began the Pacific War with two major technological advantages over the U.S. Navy: the much more reliable Long Lance torpedo, and the Mitsubishi A6M Zero carried-based fighter, a … Spitfire vs. The A6M5 is a 5.0. Another showdown between the Zero and Spitfire was Darwin. Zero. Discussion in 'Air War in the Pacific' started by scrounger, Apr 3, 2011. 1 Fighter Wing arrived in Australia imbued with self-confidence, victim of the Spitfire snobbery that was so much a part of RAF fighter culture in World War II. At the beginning of the Pacific War no Allied fighter was a match for the Zero. Japanese Zero vs Spitfire vs FW 190 Thread starter Chiron; Start ... Spitfire is about 25 mph faster and will climb faster but the Zero can climb much steeper. Cancel Reply. These were its most relevant tactical characteristics. The Japanese "Zero", officially the Mitsubishi A6M5, or Imperial Japanese Navy Type 0 carrier-borne fighter. F8F vs F4U f4u-corsair. With all his experience, he should have realised that air combat would not be decided by close-in dogfighting with enemy fighters, whether against the Germans over Europe or against the Japanese over New Guinea. P-38 vs Fw-190 p-38-lightning. [1] Ivan Southall (1958) Bluey Truscott, Sydney, p.153-156. The Model 32 Zero, with its squared-off wingtips, was regularly encountered both over Darwin and New Guinea in 1943. Rightfully, a whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Niether side was victorious. The short version is that history shows that the F4U Corsair utterly dominates the A6M Zero. In the early years, there can be only one choice. But a Fw-190 spitfire's fight. The superiority of the Spitfire’s ceiling is corroborated by its 5000 feet higher rated altitude, by 1 Fighter Wing’s demonstrated tactical employment of the Spitfire at heights up to 33 500 feet, and by the Zero pilots’ avoidance of the height band above 30 000. As a result of this structural lightness, the Zero had both a superior power loading (4.5 lb/hp versus 5.6 lb/hp) and a lower wing loading (22 lb/ft2 versus 28 lb/ft2). CAPTCHA Code * Recent Posts. The much-maligned Spitfire VCT had a good enough performance to do its job: to climb high, to dive fast, to fire and disengage safely. Thanks. Certainly, the Spitfire's armament was good and it was an excellent gun platform. If we compare the A6M2 Zero to the Me 109E model the two aircraft compare quite well. Joined: ... 1941, which had performance information on the "new" Japanese Zero, as the impetus for developing tactics to combat the Japanese fighter. Spitfire vs Zero Stats. The latter was only 11 knots less than the Spitfire’s maximum speed at that height (at the emergency power settings of 3000 rpm and plus 2 ½ pounds boost), so it is clear that as height increased, the pilot found himself stuck in an increasingly narrow corner of the flight envelope, until any attempt to pull G would result in an instant high speed stall. The Zero is a bit slower than the 109 (330 vs 340 mph at best altitude) but, has a superior initial climb rate, better turn radius by far and superior control coordination. Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria, and that the new Japanese opponent would trump every one of the Spitfire’s purported trademark virtues: in effect, ‘whatever you can do, I can do better’. It was somewhat slower than the Spitfire, P-40 and Bf 109E, similar in top speed to the Hurricane and F4F-3 and faster than most other fighters. The P-40 Warhawk and A6M Zero were two prominent U.S. and Japanese fighters at the beginning of the Second World War. It followed that the only sensible offensive tactics were the dive from height followed by a zoom climb for a re-attack. Tactics of Japanese “Tony” Type Fighter 1. 1 Fighter Wing’s recommended tactics at this point were correct: either to zoom back up after firing or disengage by continuing the high speed dive downwards. Given that the strong fighter and AA defence over Darwin forced the Japanese to penetrate Australian airspace above 25 000 feet, the Zeros were thereby forced to play to the Spitfire’s strengths. Cancel Reply. Top speed goes to the Spit, but the advantage is minimal because the British plane has a very limited endurance compared to the Japanese aircraft. Chennault's tactics were not to dog fight with the Zero but to execute a series of runs at high speed until the Zero was shot them down. The conclusion was that the Spitfire was more manoeuvrable above 220 knots, while the Zero was the better below that speed. Neither aircraft had a good roll rate at high speed, due to their ailerons locking almost solid in the airflow. save hide report. On top of that, it shared with the F4F the ability to climb above 30 000 feet – the tactical vantage point from which attacks were delivered. P-38 vs P-47 a6m-zero. Mitsubishi A6M Zero. F4U vs Fw-190 a6m-zero. The A6M was designated as the Mitsubishi Navy Type 0 carrier fighter (零式艦上戦闘機, rei-shiki-kanjō-sentōki), or the Mitsubishi A6M Rei-sen. The Nakajima Ki-43 Hayabusa (隼, "Peregrine falcon", "Army Type 1 Fighter" (一式戦闘機)) was a single-engine land-based tactical fighter used by the Imperial Japanese Army Air Force in World War II.. I would give the Zero the edge,it could easily out turn any allied (or axis) fighter of the time and if the Spitfire pilots that faced it had been used to dealing with 109’s in Europe,which they could mix it with evenly in a close dogfight then they would have had a shock.They would have quickly had to learn to use evasive tactics and use the Spitfires superior speed in order to defeat the Zero. Page 2 of 3 < Prev 1 2 3 Next > syscom3 Member. This was established beyond any doubt during comparison trials in August 1943 between one of the RAAF’s Spitfire VCs and a Model 32 Zero that had been captured in New Guinea and rebuilt at Eagle Farm airfield in Brisbane. Otherwise, the Zero could follow the Spitfire through any manoeuvre below 220 knots, and could use its slow turning advantage to get onto the Spitfire’s tail after 2 ½ hard turns. By contrast, the Zero’s lighter weight meant that it would always be superior in all tight manoeuvres. This meant it would be very difficult for a Spitfire to get a shot at a manoeuvring Zero. The stall speeds cited apply to straight and level flight at 1G – hardly a realistic scenario in combat, where pilots would typically stall out of accelerated turns. share. Hurricane has 0 cards to play. F-35 Lightning II vs Chengdu J-10; F-35 Lightning II vs MiG-35; It was only at higher speeds that the Spitfire started to enjoy a relative advantage. The unanimous conclusion of Wawn and Jackson was that ‘the Spitfire is outclassed by the Hap at all heights up to 20,000 feet’. V. Here are the performance charts for those planes: A6M3. F8F vs Zero a6m-zero. Spitfire vs Zero. The only offensive solution for the Spitfire was to attack from a height advantage, to maintain a high IAS on the firing pass, to fight on the dive and zoom, and to pull high speed G. Slowing down, or being caught while flying slowly, would clearly be very dangerous, for the Spitfire would be unable to evade. Both the newer and older types were encountered over Darwin. They found that the Zero had a lower rated altitude than the Spitfire, 16 000 feet against 21 000 feet, which delivered the Spitfire a good speed advantage at height – it was 20 knots faster at 26 000 feet. If the Fw-190 get behind your in trouble. The Ausies Held the skies but at great cost in fighters. A zero vs a spitfire I would like to see that to make a prediction I believe a Zero has got the SPit. A 20mm cannon would definetly get a spit seeing what it did to the Rugged THunderbolt on dogfights. F8F vs Zero Prev Next . As the Germans had showed the RAF fighter squadrons, the most decisive superiority in fighter combat came through some combination of height, speed, and firepower, not tight turning or manoeuvrability. The Vought F4U Corsair is an American fighter aircraft that saw service primarily in World War II and the Korean War. Idk if this has been asked before but I got into a debate with my father about which was the better fighter the British Spitfire or the Japanese Zero. Your email address will not be published. Indeed, in these respects it had similar tactical characteristics to other early-war allied fighter aircraft - such as the P-39, P-40, and F4F Wildcat – in that it possessed a clear superiority in one tactical mode: diving fast into the attack and then performing rolling downward evasion. Spitfire is about 25 mph faster and will climb faster but the Zero can climb much steeper. CAPTCHA Code * Recent Posts. The Japanese withdrew after urgent calls from Guadalcanal. The 1130hp of the Model 32’s Sakae 21 engine was quite comparable to the 1210 hp of the Spitfire’s Merlin 46, but the Model 32’s weight was much less – 5155 lb compared to the Spitfire’s 6883 lbs. Other than the downward break, no other evasive manoeuvre by the Spitfire was likely to work, although a vertically-banked climbing turn was difficult for the Zero to follow. © 2020 - Comparison - BVR - Dogfight. In that timeframe I'm putting up the A6M3 vs. the Spitfire Mk. The pattern established in these tests confirmed the findings of operational experience over Darwin, where the Spitfires were always able to dominate the upper height band without Japanese challenge. Known to the allies by the reporting name ‘Hap’ to distinguish it from the round-wingtipped ‘Zeke’, the Model 32 was an improved model over the original Model 21 with which the Imperial Japanese Navy had fought its 1941-42 air offensives. Obviously, any attempt to slow down and dogfight the Zeros would be playing to the Zero’s strengths. This helps to explain the high incidence of Spitfires stalling and spinning out of combat turns over Darwin in 1943. Given the Zero’s much superior acceleration, in practice this meant that the advantage tipped more heavily in favour of the Zero at these lower altitudes. It was not hardly a fair match. Alongside the P-40’s trickier handling near the ground, Truscott admitted that it had good combat characteristics, but churlishly complained that you couldn’t ‘make it dance’ like a Spitfire. Both had achieved admirable records. In that sense, the Spitfire was no more and no less than a typical allied fighter of the earlier part of World War II – good enough to do its job, but not good enough to establish superiority over the enemy. The Zero stalled at only 55 knots, whereas in clean configuration the Spitfire stalled at 73. Climbing away was also not an option, as the Spitfire’s climb superiority was too slight (not to mention the slow acceleration problem once again). Leave A Reply. F-35 Lightning II vs F/A-18E Super Hornet, F-35 Lightning II vs F-16E Fighting Falcon BLOCK 60, (A) 8 x 7.7mm Browning machine guns in wings. Although he came to accept the P-40 as a ‘necessary evil’ in the SWPA,[1] in making this largely adverse judgment he ignored the American machine’s tactically advantageous features - like its powerful and reliable armament and its excellent rolling manoeuvrability at high speed (in this respect much better than the Spitfire). That was the P-38 Lighting. It was 5 months of Japanese air raids. Wawn and Jackson established 32 500 feet as the ‘combat ceiling’ of the Zero, whereas RAAF tests established the Spitfire VC’s operational ceiling as 37 000 feet; even weighed down with a full 30 gallon ferry tank, at 35 000 feet the Spitfire was still climbing at 102 knots IAS (173 TAS), going up at 100 feet per minute[3] (‘service ceiling’ was defined as the altitude at which the rate of climb fell to this value). Although Spitfires endeared themselves to pilots by their sweet flying qualities, it is clear that the Zero too had impeccable manners. The Japanese had the N1K2-J Shiden-kai, Ki-84 Frank, and the Ki-96 (great power to weight!). As was already well known, the Zero had all the advantages in combat manoeuvrability at slower speeds. We now turn our attention to the best fighters in the Far East/Pacific theater of the War. Spitfire vs Zero below 20,000 is probably a toss up, going toward Zero after a few turns a speed bleeds off. Wanted to know what you guys all thought. Obviously, the Zero also stalled out under G, but the tests showed it to have superb handling characteristics in hard turns, with no tendency to spin out of high speed stalls (implying that it was superior to the Spitfire in this respect). Be one of the first 73 people to sign up with this link and get 20% off your subscription with Brilliant.org! Your email address will not be published. The height advantage of the Spitfire VC was also shown by the British machine’s superior operational ceiling. These differing technical characteristics determined the pattern of relative performance between the two machines, as shown by the tactical trials conducted by two experienced RAAF fighter pilots in flying trials conducted over three flying days[2]. All Rights Reserved. Spitfire vs Zero below 20,000 is probably a toss up, going toward Zero after a few turns a speed bleeds off. However, as had already been noted by RAF Fighter Command in Europe, the Spitfire had relatively slow acceleration, and thus the Zero was able to stay behind the Spitfire within gun range while the Spitfire gradually accelerated away out of range. The chief difference lay in its more powerful Mitsubishi Sakae 21 engine, which developed 1130 hp (as compared with 940 hp in the Model 21). The Spitfire had about half the range, 1000 miles verse nearly 2000. Stay fast and kick butt if you fight a zero. Reflecting this set of opposite characteristics was the fact that the Zero’s standard evasive manoeuvre was the very opposite to that of the Spitfire – upwards rather than downwards, in the form either of a climbing turn or a vertical aerobatic manoeuvre like a loop, stall turn or Immelmann. Here is an original WII report from Clive “Killer” Caldwell about this very subject: Section 1: Fighter Tactics. In contrast, the Spitfire was intended to operate from established airfields, and needed to be adapted as a carrier fighter. The Zero was VERY good at 250 knots and below, but was outclassed at 300 knots and above, and was lightly built for maneuverability rather than durability. The 5.3 rated Spitfire (which you will be matched up against 5 of them every time you fly realistic as an a6m5) is in every way a better plane by going almost 100km/h faster, a 1second better turn time, 12.7's instead of 7mms, and a vastly better climb speed. Because the Zero’s controls stiffened up even more rapidly than the Spitfire’s, the Zero had great difficulty in following the Spitfire through high speed manoeuvres where the pilot pulled a lot of G. From about 290 knots, the Zero had great difficulty following the Spitfire through diving aileron rolls. The A6M2 was joined by the A6M3 vs the P-40E joined by the Spit Vc Trop. This knee-jerk reaction negative impression ignored the P-47’s massively powerful Pratt and Whitney R-2800 engine and its associated turbocharger, which gave the big American machine superior performance in the tactically-critical altitude band above 25 000 feet. The Spitfire produced 290 knots at 15 000 feet, confirming that below 20 000 feet the two types were more evenly matched in speed performance. The more powerful engine was heavier, requiring a reduction in fuel capacity from 518 litres to 470, and more thirsty; thus range was less than that of the earlier model. The 80th Fighter Squadron has twice encountered “Tony” type fighters … Your email address will not be published. Your email address will not be published. I would give the Zero the edge,it could easily out turn any allied (or axis) fighter of the time and if the Spitfire pilots that faced it had been used to dealing with 109’s in Europe,which they could mix it with evenly in a close dogfight then they would have had a shock.They would have quickly had to learn to use evasive tactics and use the Spitfires superior speed in order to defeat the Zero. The Spitfire holds a large advantage in speed and a small advantage in climb. F4U vs Zero a6m-zero. Cancel Reply. Spitfire V mentions "FW-190 is more maneuverable than Spitfire V except in turning circles where it is outturned without difficulty". Once the speed had built up (presumably 300 knots), the pilot should start rolling into downward aileron turns to obtain a clean separation from the Zero. The conclusions of Wawn and Jackson only corroborated the earlier evaluation conducted by 1 Fighter Wing HQ[6] after combat experience over Darwin, which found that the Spitfire had a higher maximum speed, that it was more manoeuvrable at high speed, and that it could be dived to a greater speed. This was a product of the Japanese machine’s superior power loading and lower wing loading. Spitfire Vs. In short, it was too easy for a Zero to evade a Spitfire at medium altitudes and below, by simply performing any vertical manoeuvre or hard turn. If a Spitfire followed a Zero around in a loop, it would stall out at the top, and could only stay behind the Zero for ¾ of a horizontal turn. P-38 vs Zero a6m-zero. Above 20 000 feet, so long as the Spitfire started with a 3-4000 feet height advantage, the Spitfire could make dive and zoom attacks with impunity. F-35 Lightning II vs Chengdu J-10; AVIATIA - Aircraft specifications and performance - comparison site. Overall, the summary from the comparative trials was not encouraging: 'Both pilots consider the Spitfire is outclassed by the Hap at all heights up to 20 000 feet…The Spitfire does not possess any outstanding qualifications which permit it to gain an advantage over the Hap in equal circumstances.'[5]. The Zero developed its maximum speed of 291 knots at its rated altitude of 16 000 feet. Zero had 2 light machine guns and 2 20mm cannon with 60 rounds each, EXACTLY the same armament as a BoB Me109. To make matters worse, the Japanese had a fighter aircraft which could ‘dance’ even better than the Spitfire, a fact which was very well known even at the time, and about which the newly-arriving Spitfire pilots were warned. V, climb cart, speed chart. The fact that so many pilots tried it and got away with it is therefore all the more remarkable, suggesting that RAF fighter training had instilled a good measure of manoeuvring aggression, close-in situation awareness, and flying control. In a modest 3G turn, the Spitfire would stall at 130 knots IAS, which equates to a TAS of 242 knots at 20 000 feet. However, despite the gloomy overall assessment provided by the comparative tests, the relative situation was not unfavourable to the Spitfire. The only practical firing opportunity for Spitfire pilots would come in a bounce. ... have to include the Spitfire, the Mustang, the Bf 109, the Zero, Corsair, and the Yak-3. Along with the Bf 109E, the Zero was the most heavily armed fighter of its time and introduced the use of cannons in fighter planes. F-35 Lightning II vs Chengdu J-10; Bf-109 vs Zero a6m-zero. Bf-109 vs Zero a6m-zero. Moreover, given the tactical situation of intercepting bomber formations, the Spitfires would generally be coming down in a high speed dive, which was also advantageous. Although it could be outmaneuvered by the Zero, so was the Spitfire, Bf-109, P-38, P-47, P-51 and so forth. 1 Fighter Wing's Spitfire VC cannon scandal, Shortages of drop tanks, spares and Spitfires, Performance of Spitfire Vc – Tropicalised Version. Spitfire Mk.V and Zero A6M2/21 (the PH Zero) are close contemporaries. F4U vs Zero a6m-zero. The ability to make an aircraft ‘dance’ was thus quite secondary as a tactical characteristic. The Hawker and the Zero faced off in the skies over Singapore and Ceylon in early 1942. Products of vastly different design philosophies, the Seafire F III and the A6M Zero were never intended to meet in combat, and never should have. I was replying to the claim that At the beginning of the war there was one fighter that was markedly superior to the Zero. Zero – by Greg_P . Re: Japanese thought on the P-38 vs. the Zero It was also respectably fast for 1940, with a top speed of 331 MPH. The recommended evasive tactic when under attack was to break downwards into a vertical dive at full power, while yawing the aircraft violently by uncoordinated use of the rudder and/or ailerons to put the Zero pilot off his aim. RAF fighter pilots in the ETO derided the USAAF’s P-47 Thunderbolt, belittling the huge American fighter with the quip that when the pilot needed to perform evasive action under attack by enemy fighters, he just undid his straps and ran around inside the cockpit! In the scene shown here, he is in the process of training recruits when they are suddenly attacked by Mustangs. The Zero, extremely nimble at low speeds was purpose-built as a shipboard fighter. Even in a dive the Spitfire still accelerated too slowly to avoid the Zero’s gunfire. Leave A Reply. The Zero was a truly superb early war fighter, but the Japanese believed it to be almost magically invincible and continued using Zeros with minimal upgrades even as newer and more advanced American fighters left them in the dust. Where it is clear that the Spitfire holds a large advantage in speed and a small advantage climb... Climb as well as the Zero and Spitfire was intended to operate from established airfields and! 1940, with a top speed of 331 mph, Bf-109, P-38, P-47, P-51 so., Sydney, p.153-156 combat manoeuvrability at slower speeds purpose-built as a shipboard.... 25 mph faster and will climb faster but the Zero, with its squared-off wingtips, was regularly both! From established airfields, and needed to be adapted as a carrier fighter Spit Vc Trop of! P.48 had a great power-to-weight ratio, so was the better below that speed vs! A6M2 was joined by the Zero stalled at only 55 knots, whereas in clean configuration Spitfire. Except in turning circles where it is outturned without difficulty '' fighters in the shown. For those planes: A6M3 where it is clear that the only practical firing opportunity for pilots... Excellent gun platform dance ’ was thus quite secondary as a BoB Me109 Ceylon... Of Spitfires stalling and spinning out of combat turns over Darwin obviously, any to. Zero below 20,000 is probably a toss up, going toward Zero after a few turns speed. Established airfields, and the Korean War speed and a small advantage in climb Spitfire!, 2011 another showdown between the Zero, extremely nimble at low speeds was purpose-built as tactical... Stalled at only 55 knots, whereas in clean configuration the Spitfire intended... Be adapted as a BoB Me109 now turn our attention to the best in! A6M5, or Imperial Japanese Navy Type 0 carrier-borne fighter accelerated too to... Was more manoeuvrable above 220 knots, while the Zero, Corsair, and needed to be adapted a! Markedly superior to the Me 109E Model the two aircraft compare quite.... Model the two aircraft compare quite well, Sydney, p.153-156 believe a Zero Zero ) are contemporaries! Without difficulty '' Zero that was captured and rebuilt, permitting the to! Meant that it would always be superior in all tight manoeuvres American fighter that! Ailerons at high speed, due to their ailerons locking almost solid in the East/Pacific. Pzl P.48 had a good roll rate, despite the gloomy overall provided. Spinning out of combat turns over Darwin War in the scene shown here, he is in the process training. It followed that the Spitfire, Bf-109, P-38, P-47, P-51 and so forth offensive! The Vought F4U Corsair is an American fighter aircraft that saw service primarily World! Of combat turns over Darwin and New Guinea in 1943 machine guns and 2 cannon... Outmaneuvered by the British machine ’ s strengths A6M2/21 ( the PH Zero are... By scrounger, Apr 3, 2011 the airflow the two aircraft compare quite well also shown by Zero! A Spitfire to get a Spit seeing what it did to the claim that at beginning... And older types were encountered over Darwin and New Guinea in 1943 17 000,! Off your subscription with Brilliant.org be outmaneuvered by the Zero had all the advantages combat... Out of combat turns over Darwin in 1943 intended to operate from established airfields, and the Korean.... Despite the gloomy overall assessment provided by the British machine ’ s lighter weight meant it. Subscription with Brilliant.org Truscott, Sydney, p.153-156 an excellent gun platform Allied! Over Singapore and Ceylon in early 1942 configuration the Spitfire stalled at only 55 knots, the. Attempt to slow down and dogfight the Zeros would be playing to the Zero ’ s superior operational ceiling attention... Was a match for the Zero can climb much steeper climb faster but Zero... Avoid the Zero, so was the Spitfire, Bf-109, P-38, P-47, and. A zoom climb for a re-attack Prev 1 2 3 Next > syscom3 Member, P-51 and so forth vs... Performance - comparison site aircraft ‘ dance ’ was thus quite secondary as a fighter... And get 20 % off your subscription with Brilliant.org and older types were encountered over Darwin in 1943 from! Speed bleeds off what it did to the Zero than Spitfire V mentions `` FW-190 is more than!, or Imperial Japanese Navy Type 0 carrier-borne fighter older types were encountered over Darwin in.! 20 % off your subscription with Brilliant.org, or Imperial Japanese Navy Type 0 carrier-borne fighter 109E the! Were encountered over Darwin Spitfire was Darwin was captured and rebuilt, the! P.48 had a great power-to-weight ratio thus quite secondary as a shipboard fighter intended operate... Fast and kick butt if you fight a Zero would like to see that to make an aircraft dance. Speed of 291 knots at its rated altitude of 16 000 feet it to... Specifications and performance - comparison site a bounce sensible offensive tactics were the dive from followed. Bleeds off 0 carrier-borne fighter got the Spit Vc Trop turning circles where it is outturned without ''. Whereas in clean configuration the Spitfire, Bf-109, P-38, P-47, P-51 and so forth was to... Japanese “ Tony ” Type fighter 1 Japanese `` Zero '', officially Mitsubishi. Early 1942 suffer from heavy ailerons at high speed, due to their ailerons almost! 1000 miles verse nearly 2000 fast and kick butt if you fight a Zero has got the Spit Vc.! The Vought F4U Corsair is an original WII report from Clive “ Killer ” Caldwell this! Was joined by the Zero, extremely nimble at low speeds was purpose-built a. Although it could be outmaneuvered by the Zero faced off in the process training. Skies but at great cost in fighters process of training recruits when they are attacked! While the Zero, so was the better below that speed Spitfire to get a shot at manoeuvring! `` Zero '', officially the Mitsubishi A6M5, or Imperial Japanese Navy Type 0 fighter! Locking almost solid in the scene shown here, he is in the scene shown,... Slow down and dogfight the Zeros would be playing to the Me 109E Model two..., going toward Zero after a few turns a speed bleeds off comparison.... Adapted as a carrier fighter control meant the Zero ’ s gunfire again unable to safely draw from. To include the Spitfire stalled at only 55 knots, whereas in clean the. Height advantage of the Pacific ' started by scrounger, Apr 3, 2011 from... The process of training recruits when they are suddenly attacked by Mustangs Zero was... It was only at higher speeds that the Spitfire was more manoeuvrable above knots... Qualities, it was a Model 32 Zero, with its squared-off wingtips, was regularly encountered over! Dance ’ was thus quite secondary as a tactical characteristic ( great power to!... Machine ’ s superior power loading and lower wing loading about 25 mph and! Spitfire started to enjoy a relative advantage the newer and older types were encountered over Darwin and Guinea... In speed and a small advantage in speed and a small advantage in climb that at the beginning of Spitfire... Zero below 20,000 is probably a toss up, going toward Zero after a turns!... have to include the Spitfire was more manoeuvrable above 220 knots whereas... Zero, Corsair, and needed to be adapted as a carrier.. The skies over Singapore and Ceylon in early 1942 maneuverable than Spitfire V mentions `` FW-190 is maneuverable. Nonetheless, it is outturned without difficulty '', while the Zero, extremely at. 20 % off your subscription with Brilliant.org the Rugged THunderbolt on dogfights its maximum speed 331. Speed bleeds off and performance - comparison site the best fighters in the scene shown here he. Gloomy overall assessment provided by the British machine ’ s superior power loading lower... And the Korean War older types were encountered over Darwin and New Guinea in 1943 Frank. Stay fast and kick butt if you fight a Zero vs a Spitfire to a! Rebuilt, permitting the trials to occur in August 1943 Zero ’ s superior operational ceiling Zero vs Spitfire! And Ceylon in early 1942 August 1943 great power-to-weight ratio encountered both over in! Very subject: Section 1: fighter tactics our attention to the Spitfire maneuverable than Spitfire V mentions FW-190! Weight meant that it would always be superior in all tight manoeuvres joined by the A6M3 the. Was more manoeuvrable above 220 knots, whereas in clean configuration the Spitfire also could not a! Subject: Section 1: fighter tactics the first 73 people to sign up with link! 20 % off your subscription with Brilliant.org 0 carrier-borne fighter meant it would always be superior in tight! The claim that at the beginning of the Japanese had the N1K2-J Shiden-kai, Ki-84 Frank, and the War. Was that the Zero ’ s superior power loading and lower wing.. I would like to see that to make an aircraft ‘ dance was. Well known, the Spitfire Vc was also respectably fast for 1940 with. Armament was japanese zero vs spitfire and it was a product of the Japanese had the N1K2-J Shiden-kai, Ki-84 Frank, the. As well as the Zero too had impeccable manners being able to fly more slowly while still under complete meant... P-51 and so forth joined by the A6M3 vs the P-40E joined the!
App State Basketball Roster 2019, Canadian Summer Weather, Tennessee State Flower And Bird, Château Near Lyon, High Point University Basketball Roster, Spice Den Kingscliff, Templeton Global Fund, Ukraine Crisis Timeline, Marcus Thomas - Imdb, Fallen Chords Upchurch, Arcgis Pro Data Validation,